Last week, I needed to make a quick stop at Guitar Center for a fresh pack of strings. But of course I couldn't help but wander the store for 30 minutes, checking out all the neat toys. In the middle of the recording section, a folding table with stacks of black boxes and a sale sign caught my attention. Shure SM48's for dirt cheap? Why yes, I think I will.
Shure has a reputation for making quality microphones. I've used (but never owned) the SM57 for vocals, guitars and drums in the past. It certainly earns its place as the most popular all-around mic for musicians. I haven't yet have the opportunity to use an SM58, the vocal variant of the 57.
Holding the 48 just gives me warm feelings inside. It's solid steel construction makes it extremely heavy for its size (half a pound for something the size of a banana). It certainly doesn't feel like a toy. Shure is known for durability, and some musicians carry their 57s and 58s around for decades before they go bad. I have the same confidence in this mic, though only time will tell.
I bought the SM48-LC version of the microphone. The only difference between the LC and XLR version is that the XLR version comes with a cable. But I was very happy with the accessories it did come with: A hard plastic mic clip, a mic bag and a cable tie.
So how does the SM48 perform in the basement studio?
My first experience with the mic was frustrating. The 48 takes a lot of gain to even register. When I tried plugging the XLR straight into my Zoom R16 audio interface the pre-amp could barely push the signal above audible. So instead, I had to use my Mackie 1402-VLZ Pro mixer with higher quality pre-amps. Much better.
The sound doesn't meet the performance of the 57, and presumably the 58. It's very dim and took some EQ work to brighten it up and grab some air. This may of course be due to my low singing, but it's something I didn't have problems with on the 57.
But after the pre-amp switch and the EQ fix, it sounds decent and worth the money I paid for it. I would not, however, pay the full $49.99 asking price when I could get a top-shelf 57 or 58 for under $100. But for $20 off and the added accessories, it was definitely a value buy and will get me through 'til I'm looking for a serious vocal mic.
Do you own an SM48? Ever been pleasantly surprised with a cheap mic? Disappointed in an expensive one?
Nice post...I'm not a musician by any stretch of the imagination, but your blog does appear to be very informative for those DIY artists lurking out there.
ReplyDeleteNot only that, it was quite educational in seeing the various technical aspects of microphones...your typical layperson has no idea of the many small, detailed aspects it takes to put together a great sounding performance, recording, etc.
Again, very nice job.
Thanks for the comment. I realize there isn't anyone here to talk shop about this kind of stuff, but stay tuned for some things I think most music fans would be more interested in.
DeleteIf anyone does get the urge to start singing and they need a mic, at least they know a little more about the SM48.
Cheers.
I've read that the SM48 doesn't have an internal transformer like the SM58 has, hence the lack of "hot" signal, so it needs a lot more pre-amp. I presume that the absence of an internal transformer helps keep the price lower as well.
ReplyDeleteSmokey
Thanks for posting! I ran this site as a school project a while back. I didn't find any info on an internal transformers while doing my research, but it makes sense.
DeleteMy next vocal mic was an AKG Perception 120 which was light years beyond the SM48 and captured my vocals extremely well when isolated. I should say it captured MY vocals well. I've had mixed results with other people. I also picked up a pair of 57's which still work better for vocals than the 48 and I use those for live recordings. So the 48 is just a box warmer nowadays.
Thanks and I have a tremendous give: How Long Renovate House how to renovate a house
ReplyDelete